On the border of two epochs (Johann Philopon in the arguement with the Aristotelian conception of space)
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
On the border of two epochs (Johann Philopon in the arguement with the Aristotelian conception of space)
Annotation
PII
S0205-96060000622-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
28-42
Abstract
Вопросы истории естествознания и техники, On the border of two epochs (Johann Philopon in the arguement with the Aristotelian conception of space)
Date of publication
01.09.1983
Number of purchasers
0
Views
53
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Additional services access
Additional services for the article
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Pauly-Wissowa R. E. V. IX, 2, Joannes 21, col. 1764—1793 (Gudeman).
2. Sarnbursky S. The Physical World of the Late Antiquty. London, 1962.
3. Saffrey H.-D. Le chrbtien Jean Philopon et la survivance de I’ecole d’Ale.xandrie au Vl-e siecle.— Revue des etudes grecques 67(1954), 396—410.
4. Philoponus Joaniids. In Phys. comment./Ed. Vitelli H. Berlin, 1887; Philoponus Joannes. In de anima comment/Ed. Hayduch M. Berlin, 1897; Philoponus Joannes. In degener et corr. comment./Vitelli H. Berlin, 1897; Philoponus Joannes. In meteor, comment./Ed. M. Hayduck. Berlin, 1901.
5. philoponus Joannes. De aeternitate mundi contra Proclum/Ed. Rabe H. Leipzi
6. Philoponus Joannes. De opificio mundi/Ed. Reichardt G. Leipzig, 1S97.
7, Wieland W. Die Ewigkeit der Welt (Die Gegenwart der Griechen in neuerem Denken).— Festschrift fur H. G. Gadamer zum 60. Geburtstag. Tubingen, 1960.
8. Plato. Tim. 53 B. (Shaton. Sochineniya v trekh to.makh. T. 3. Ch. I. M., 1971, s. 494).
9. Simplicius. In de caelo comment. Ed. Heiberg J. L. Berlin, 1894.
10. Simplicius. In phys. comment.,Ed. Dieis H. Berlin, 1882.
11 Aristoteics. Phvs., 1.201a 10—11 (Aehistotel'. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 3. M., 1981, s. 104).
12. Simplicius. In phvs. 1140, 13—14.
13. Phvs. A, 4. I87a. 28—29 (T. 3, c. 68).
14. Phys. L. 11. 220a. 24—25 (T. 3, c. 150).
15. De gen. et corr. 220a, 24—25 (T. 3, c. 422—427).
16. Majorov G. G. Formirovanie srednevekovoj filosofii. M., 1979, s. 292—298.
17. Augustinus. Confcssiones. XI, 14 (G. G. Majorov, s. 292).
18. Sarnbursky ,S. r. 122—132.
19. De caelo V, 7. 289a 34—35 (T. 3, s. 319).
20. Meteor. A, 3, 340', 1—2 (T. 3, s. 447).
21. Meteor. A, 3, 341a, 26—27 (T. 3, s. 449).
22. Meteor. A, 3. 341a, 35—36 (T. 3, s. 449).
23. Philophon. In meteor. 47, 18 i dalee.
24. Simplicius. In de caelo 89, 4—7.
25. Psaltir', 18, 2.
26. Simplicius, In de caelo. 90, 12—18.
27. Pervoe poslanie k korinfyanam, 15. 41.
28. Philopon. de opif. IV, 12. 184, 26—185, 13.
29. Simplicius. In de caelo. 89, 16—19.
30. Simplicius. In de caelo. 87, 29—88, 5.
31. Simplicius. In phvs. 1335, 5-16.
32. Simplicius. In de caelo. 134, 24—32.
33. Simplicius. In de caelo 142, 7—17.
34. Philopon. De opif. Sh, 4, Ts6, 26—117, 24.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate