Везде
History of two alternative trends in geotecionics
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
History of two alternative trends in geotecionics
Annotation
PII
S0205-96060000622-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Igor A. Rezanov 
Edition
Issue 3
Pages
36-44
Abstract

The paper deals with the discussion that took place in giology between the adherents of fi.xism (who emphasized the vertical movements of the earth crust) and the adherentsof mobilism (who believed in the horizontal earth crust movements). The author demonstra tes that the mobilistic conception, taken historically, only represents a passing pheno menon and will be abolished with the forthcoming development of the Earth sciences.

Date of publication
01.09.1980
Number of purchasers
0
Views
42
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Batyushkov YA. V. Istoriya problemy proiskhozhdeniya kontinentov i okeanov. M., «Nauka», 1975, s, 138
  2. Og E. Geologiya (Per. s franc., 6-e izd.). ONTI, L., 1935, s. 457
  3. Kobeg L. Der Ban der Erde. Berlin, 1921. 
  4. Belousov V. V. Obshchaya geotektonika. M.— L., Gosgeotekhizdat, 1948; SHatskij N. S Gipoteza Vegenera i geosinklinali.— «Izv. AN SSSR. Ser. geol.», 1946, №4
  5. Tetyaev M. M. Osnovy geotektoniki. M. 1934, s. 71.
  6. Kropotkin P. N. Kritika nekotoryh tektonicheskih teorij fiksizma.— «Izv. AN SSSR. Ser. geol.>, 1964. № b, s. 12.
  7. Solov'eva I. A. O prirode razlomov severo-vostochnoj chasti Tihogo okeana.— «Geologiya i geofizika», Novosibirsk, 1976, № 11, s. I—22.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate