"THE LEARNED DAMSELS ARE RIDICULOUS?" (THE PROBLEM OF LEARNED WOMEN'S STIGMATIZATION AND THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS ON WOMEN'S LIFE STRATEGIES AND LIFESTYLES)
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
"THE LEARNED DAMSELS ARE RIDICULOUS?" (THE PROBLEM OF LEARNED WOMEN'S STIGMATIZATION AND THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS ON WOMEN'S LIFE STRATEGIES AND LIFESTYLES)
Annotation
PII
S0205-96060000527-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
756-770
Abstract
The concept of stigma introduced by E. Goffman, a characteristic that deviates from the established norms or stereotypes expected from an individual / group, has proved to be a handy tool widely used in sociology. This paper is devoted to the stigmatization of women interested or professionally engaged in science in Russia in the past and in the present from the historical and contemporary perspective. The factors conducive to stigmatization as well as particular features of women scientists' professional trajectories are analyzed. The paper continues the years-long studies by the author writing about the gender component of the system of characteristics of scientific community in the USSR and contemporary Russia.
Keywords
science, women, gender, gender symmetry, discrimination
Date of publication
01.10.2017
Number of purchasers
1
Views
690
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1 заказать дипломную работу http://author24.us
заказать дипломную работу http://author24.us

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Bovina I. G, Bovin V. G. Stigmatizatsiya: sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie aspekty // Psikhologiya i pravo. 2013. № 3. C. 13 
2. Gagnon, N. On the Life Accounts//Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences/D. Bertaux (ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1981
3. Pomyalovskij N. G. Molotov//http://az.lib.ru/p/pomjalowskij_n_g/text_0020.shtmL
4. Paustovskij K. G. Fyon//http://paustovskiy.niv.ru/paustovskiy/text/kolhida/kolhida_4.htm
5. Lyskova I. E. Problemy uchaschejsya molodezhi Rossii kontsa XIX -nachala KhKh vv. v osveschenii N. I. Kareeva. Syktyvkar, 2010. S. 163
6. Crocker, J., Major, B., Steele, C. Social Stigma//Handbook of Social Psychology/D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (eds.). Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1998. R. 504-553
7. Croker, J., Major, B. Social Stigma and Self-Esteem: The Self-Protective Properties of Stigma//Psychological Review. 1989. Vol. 96. No. 4. P. 608-630
8. Linkova M. «Nauka poka opiraetsya na muzhskie tsennosti»//http://www.radio.cz/ru/rubrika/razgovor/marcela-linkova-nauka-poka-opiraetsya-na-muzhskie-cennosti
9. Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. M.: Medium, 1995. S. 231
10. Boroda pomogla by zhenschine stat' professorom//https://lenta.ru/news/2004/12/17/beard/
11. Vaschenko S. V. Problemy gendernogo balansa v oblasti fiziko-tekhnicheskikh nauk//Zhenschiny i nauka -istoriya i sovremennost'/Red.-sost. R. F. Vitman. SPb.: Izd-vo Politekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2007. S. 177-180 (sm. takzhe: http://belwomnet.iatp.by/list_ file.php?p=27%C0%03d=27&c=5&file=5_drugoe_science_vashchenko.html)
12. Kochina P. Ya. Nauka. Lyudi. Gody. M.: Nauka, 1988. S. 263.
13. Mustafina S. S. Ajdarova: «Strana obyazana byt' protsvetayuschej»//http://www. dknews.kz/article.php?id=963&archid=39.
14. Osobaya sud'ba. Interv'yu s T. I. Rudnevoj//http://www.universite.ru/index. php?option=com_content&task=view&id=322&Itemid=72
15. Demina N. Revekka Frumkina: «Esli nauka dlya vas -ne strast', zajmites' chem-nibud' esche//http://www.polit.ru/article/2006/07/24/frumkina/
16. Vot on kakoj, muzhskoj shovinizm!//http://www.aspirantura.spb.ru/cgi-bin/ib/printpage. cgi?forum=2&topic=506
17. Agamova N. S., Allakhverdyan A. G. Dinamika chislennosti kadrov v sotsial'nykh naukakh i aspiranture: gendernoe issledovanie//Institut istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki im. S. I. Vavilova. Godichnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya (2013). M.: LENAND, 2013. T. 1 (Obschie problemy razvitiya nauki i tekhniki. Istoriya fiziko-matematicheskikh nauk). S. 248-249
18. Avdulov A. N. Preodolevaya predubezhdeniya i bar'ery: o realizatsii potentsiala zhenschin v nauke i tekhnike//Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura Ser. 8. Naukovedenie (RZh INION RAN). 2008. № 1. S. 156
19. Tartakovskaya I. Kar'era zhenschiny v industrii//Chelovecheskie resursy. 1998. № 2. S. 36-41
20. 23Demina. Revekka Frumkina..; Frumkina R.M. O nas -naiskosok. M.: Russkie slovari, 1997.
21. Kochina. Nauka. Lyudi. Gody. S. 262.
22. Kushnareva G. Edinstvennaya //Vladivostok (gazeta). 1 fevralya 2005 g. № 1696 (sm. takzhe: http://vladnews.ru/1696/lichnost/edinstvennaya).
23. Levada Yu. Chelovek nedovol'nyj: protest i terpenie//Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 1991. № 6 (44). S. 7
24. Sycheva S. A. Vozmozhna li kar'era zhenschiny v rossijskoj nauke//Vestnik RAN. 2003. T. 73. № 7. S. 622.
25. Tam zhe. S. 625.
26. Sistematizatsiya grupp Yu. Levady. Sm. Levada. Chelovek nedovol'nyj.. S. 12.
27. Agamova N. S., Allakhverdyan A. G. Rossijskie zhenschiny v nauke i vysshej shkole: isto-riko-nauchnye i naukovedcheskie aspekty (k 150-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya S. V. Kovalevskoj)//VIET. 2000. № 1. S. 141-153
28. Pushkareva N. L. «Da zachem mne ehto nuzhno?!» (pochemu rossijskie zhenschiny-uchenye ne «rvutsya spesivo» k nauchnoj slave)//Rossijskaya povsednevnost' v zerkale gendernykh otnoshenij: sb. st./Otv. red. i sost. N. L. Pushkareva. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2013. C. 838-855
29. Sycheva. Vozmozhna li kar'era zhenschiny.. S. 625.
30. Uchenye vyyasnili, kak pravil'no pooschryat' sotrudnikov//http://www.bitpersonal.ru/news.htm?news=all.
31. Frumkina. O nas -naiskosok. S. 184.
32. Balabanova E. S. Gendernye razlichiya strategij sovladaniya s zhiznennymi trudnostyami//Sotsis. 2002. № 11. S. 32.
33. Remnyova M. L. «My byli romantikami i lyubili chitat'..»//Vremya, ostavsheesya s nami: filologicheskij fakul'tet v 1953-1958 gg. Vospominaniya vypusknikov. M.: Filologicheskij fakul'tet MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova; MAKS Press, 2004. S. 13 (sm. takzhe: http://www.philol.msu.ru/~alumni/memories/remniova/).
34. Kuramshina G. U nauki zhenskoe litso //Vatandash (Sootechestvennik). 2005. № 9 (sm. takzhe: http://www.vatandash.ru/index.php?article=451).
35. Vasil'eva A. Zhenschiny v nauke i obrazovanii //Zhenschina plyus. 1999. № 2 (sm. takzhe: http://www.owl.ru/win/womplus/1999/science.htm).
36. Sycheva. Vozmozhna li kar'era zhenschiny.. S. 625.
37. Sukovataya V. A. Feministskaya ehpistemologiya i ehtika kak popytki dekonstruktsii zhenskoj «drugovosti» v nauke//Vyunik Kharyuvs'kogo natsyunal'nogo ushversitetu 1mesh V. N. Karazsha. 2011. № 958. Vyp. 2. C. 229-235.
38. Terner R. Sravnitel'nyj kontent-analiz biografij//Voprosy sotsiologii. 1992. T 1. № 1. S. 121.
39. Simakova N. V. Zhenschiny-uchenye i perestrojka//Intelligentsiya i perestrojka/Otv. red. S. N. Bykova, V. A. Mansurov. M.: Institut sotsiologii AN SSSR, 1991. S. 169.
40. «Za fizikov ya by otdala pyat' devochek, vpolne khoroshikh devochek-laborantok, kotorye nam, odnako, ne nuzhny.. » (Davydova N. Vsya zhizn' plyus dva chasa. M.: Sovetskij pisatel', 1967. S. 2).
41. Crane, D. Social Class Origin and Academic Success: The Influence of Two Stratification System on Academic Careers//Sociology of Education. 1969. No. 42. P. 1-18.
42. Lanskikh E. Kakie trudnosti voznikayut u zhenschiny-uchenogo//https://www.gazeta.ru/education/2006/05/16_e_640532.shtml.
43. 46Dezhina I. Ischite, zhenschiny!//Poisk. 5 marta 2003 g. S. 5.
44. Ehntova A. Takaya znakomaya diskriminatsiya//http://www.jewishagency.org/ru/sites/default/files/Entova.pdf).
45. Na Altae obnaruzhili komarov-razvedchikov//https://www.chel.kp.ru/daily/24137/356264/
46. Linkova. «Nauka poka opiraetsya na muzhskie tsennosti».
47. Davydova. Vsya zhizn'.. S. 5, 8.
48. Vedeneeva N. Tovarisch Tanya, vy bol'shoj uchenyj //Moskovskij komsomolets. 25 marta 2011 g. № 25600. S. 15.
49. Proskurina (Yavolovich) M. M. Feminizatsiya nauki kak sotsiologicheskaya problema//Sotsis. 2002. № 3. S. 76.
50. Pushkareva N.L. Nauka -ne zhenskoe delo? K istorii feminizatsii rossijskoj nauki v nachale XXI veka // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. «Istoriya». 2012. № 14. Vyp. 2. S. 105-121.
51. Kharlamenkova N. E. Psikhologicheskij aspekt problemy samoutverzhdeniya lichnosti//Vestnik RGNF. 1996. № 3. S. 186-187.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate